H2OPower
-A Journal of Science, Alternative Energy and the Environment-

Contributor:
Mike Johnston


View my page on PickensPlan

Custom Search












Contact Me At

mj_17870@yahoo.com
or IM me at mj_17870 on Yahoo


archives
2008 August
2008 July
2008 June
2008 January
2007 December
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 May
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June








Half.com: CDs under $2.99





Ask Santa to call child today

Peapod







What Is Clean Coal and Why Should I Care?
06.30.08 (7:20 am)
The term "Clean Coal" is being used to describe several different processes. Some are only new ways to try to remove pollutants from the smoke produced by burning coal. Some of these pollutants are sulfur (which combines with water in the atmosphere to produce sulfuric acid (acid rain) and mercury (which builds up in your system and can cause brain damage). Other technologies offer something completely different and it is on those that I would like to focus here. The FutureGen system is one that has received government research and development funding to the tune of millions of dollars and is on the verge of building a power plant in Illinois. In this system coal is not really the fuel used to produce electricity. Coal (or any other source of carbon such as charcoal or even torrified cornstalks and straw). In this process 1000 degree steam is passed over coal in the absence of air. This causes a chemical reaction between the oxygen in the water molecules in the steam and the carbon molecules in the coal: 2H2O + C ------ 2H2 + CO2. The carbon dioxide produced is then taken out of the mix and the hydrogen (H2) is used to fuel the power plant. There are many advantages to using hydrogen as the fuel in an electrical generator. One of these is that it burns much hotter than carbon does and so you need less hydrogen fuel than you would coal. Another consequence is that, because you use less fuel, you produce significantly less carbon dioxide than a normal coal plant. Still another advantage is that when you burn hydrogen the product is superheated steam (2H2 + O2 ------ 2H2O). This steam can be used to turn the turbines that drive the generators in the plant with very few losses. In a traditional coal fired plant the coal is burned outside a vessel that contains water (a boiler) to create the steam needed to turn the generators. This means that much of the heat created by burning coal goes up the chimney and is lost. The FutureGen system is therefore vastly superior to a traditional coal fired plant. It is the first large scale electrical generator which uses clean, renewable hydrogen fuel from water. Unfortunately the designers of this system tried to go too far too fast and proposed pumping the carbon dioxide that is produced by releasing the hydrogen fuel from water underground to sequester it. This sequestration plan is untested and has become the major sticking point of the whole project. I think that this is unfortunate because even without the sequestration plan this plant is a huge step forward in our goal of ending our dependence on fossil fuels. Another unpublicized bonus with this system is that you could use the hydrogen fuel produced to run cars, trucks, trains, ships or any vehicle with an internal combustion engine. That's right, you can, in effect, run your car on coal (actually on hydrogen produced through this process) and since coal is still around a hundred bucks a ton or less that would mean that your hydrogen fuel would cost roughly .25 cents a gallon (a rough estimate). There is a way to use a process very similar to this one with water and liquid hydrocarbon fuels as well and in that case you can produce your hydrogen fuel on board the vehicle as you drive. That process would increase your hydrocarbon fuel mileage by up to 60% and reduce your carbon dioxide emissions by an equal percentage. The tools necessary for us to cut our fossil fuel consumption and carbon dioxide output on a worldwide basis are there but we are just not aware of them or being told about them (whichever you like).
0 Comments
Unfriendly Skies: Europe Orders Airlines To Pollute Less
06.29.08 (4:16 am)

Unfriendly Skies: Europe Orders Airlines To Pollute Less

Airlines must feel like somebody is kicking them while they’re down. First terrorism and SARS scared people away from flying. Then when passengers came back, fuel prices shot so high, airlines had trouble affording to stay in the air. Now, the European Union wants airlines to pay for the emissions they cough out.

Contrails_art_200_20080627110744.jpg
Pony up (AP)

After years of talking about including aviation in its emissions control scheme, Europe finally let the hammer fall. Under the decision, airlines that take off or land in Europe—including American and other foreign carriers—will face limits on greenhouse-gas emissions. The sector’s emissions will be capped, starting in 2012, and airlines will have to buy 15% of their emissions permits from the EU. In the first phase of Europe’s cap-and-trade scheme, industry received all its emissions permits for free.

It’s the first time Europe has included any transportation sector in the cap-and-trade scheme, which basically targets industry and power companies. The idea is to eventually link up with other countries, such as the U.S., to cover as much of the global aviation industry as possible.

 

 

My Coments: It is funny that we never hear about the realistic ways to reduce both fuel consumption and CO2 pollution. Check out the comment I left on this story to see what I mean...

 

0 Comments
Arctic May Be Ice Free This Year
06.29.08 (4:01 am)

Aalok Mehta aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen

National Geographic News

June 20, 2008

Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer, report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field. "We're actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history]," David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker.

Click here for full story.  

 

My Thoughts: When I was growing up I always thought that it would have been cool to be alive at one or another great moment in history. The past always seems so black and white because all of the questions and unknowns have been resolved (usually) and it is easy to see what was or would have been the right course to have followed.

Here we are now at what may be just such a moment in history and it is far from clear what is the right thing to do or maybe even if there is anything that we can do. Nevertheless I am happy to be alive at this moment in time to watch it all unfold. 

0 Comments










Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.